A driver told how a man flashed what looked like a warrant card at her and ordered her to pull over on the motorway – but he wasn’t a police officer.
Fearing he wanted to ‘do her harm’, she refused to stop, noting the number plates of the unmarked car.
She contacted police to ask them about the incident in March 2023, and it was discovered that the man had previously worked for police in a civilian role, but was not an officer.
But two forces have now apologised to her for a substandard and late response.
The woman, who used ‘Lisa’ as a pseudonym, told the BBC that she dreads what might have happened if she had stopped and still finds the incident traumatic.
Disgraced ex-policeman Wayne Couzens used his warrant card to stop Sarah Everard in March 2021 before raping and murdering her, and reading about this case was part of why Lisa refused to stop.
Lisa admits she was speeding at around 80mph while driving northbound on her own on the M1 in Leicestershire.
A lone male driver then crossed ahead of her and started waving a black wallet with a card out of the window, marked ‘with an EIIR Royal-style symbol’, it was reported.
Her first thought was to stop but something made her feel uneasy so she crossed to the middle lane and carried on driving.
She told how the man pulled alongside her with his window down and started angrily shouting at her to stop, while ‘waving the badge that I can clearly see is a black wallet with a police crest badge stuck on the outside.’
When she still did not stop, he eventually turned off the motorway.
But Lisa is concerned that the incident was not investigated properly despite her reporting it immediately.
At first it was not picked up that the man was not really an officer, which led to the report being treated as a complaint rather than a crime.
The BBC reported that Lisa received a letter from the Professional Standards Department of Northamptonshire Police to apologise in February this year.
It read: ‘You were left feeling distressed following a male’s actions and this should have been investigated as a crime from the outset.’
Twelve months after the incident, the force finally contacted the man by phone and he denied the allegations. They did not visit his home.
Northamptonshire Police confirmed that the man had worked for them as a detention officer contractor between September 2021 and December 2022.
They said he would not have been issued with a card stamped with an EIIR Crest and it would not have been given to him in a black wallet.
But they acknowledged he would have been given a card showing the Northamptonshire Police crest, though it would state clearly it was ‘Not a warrant card’.
Such ID cards should be returned as soon as employment ends, but the force said:’Unfortunately there is no clear record of the card being returned in this case.
‘This has since been addressed and processes tightened to ensure all property is recovered and clearly recorded.
‘However, the ID card itself was cancelled when his employment ended, meaning he had no access to police property, buildings or systems after that date.’
They said they had not received any further complaints regarding the man.
After the potential crime was realised, the issue was passed onto Leicestershire Police as it happened in their area.
But by this time, there was no CCTV available and the incident was not logged until almost the end of the six-month limit for ‘impersonating a police officer’ to be prosecuted as a crime, and the man was not spoken to in time,
Leicester Police said it was understood that the original report regarding the incident had been made to Derbyshire Police. Following initial enquiries, the report had then been passed to Northamptonshire Police before Leicestershire Police were notified.
A crime report was created on August 29 2023, just over a month after they were notified on July 18.
The force said in a statement: ‘Initial enquiries were carried out. However, due to a six-month statutory time limit placed on prosecuting summary only offences, and evidential difficulties, Leicestershire Police were unable to progress the report further.
‘The circumstances of this outcome were explained to the victim at the time.
‘Following a complaint received in November 2023, Leicestershire Police issued an apology to the victim in December 2023 for the delay in the crime report being made by Leicestershire Police following the notification received.
‘Leicestershire Police takes any report of impersonation of a police officer extremely seriously however on this occasion our response did fall below the standard expected.
‘The victim was informed that organisational learning has been identified following this in relation to progressing reports of crime efficiently.’
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE : Baby boy dies after suffering cardiac arrest at Legoland
MORE : Woman admits role in monkey torture network where animals were put in blenders
MORE : Will gloves made of seaweed goo be next Japanese trend to sweep the globe?
Get your need-to-know
latest news, feel-good stories, analysis and more
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.