Any indications that Russia attempted to sway an election in a NATO nation would reveal a kind of hybrid assault aimed at undermining the alliance from within.
These so-called “political influence operations” can utilize social media to elevate a specific candidate, enhancing their prospects for success, and are intentionally challenging to link to any source—ambiguity being an inherent part of the arsenal that complicates defensive measures.
Nevertheless, allied nations are striving to improve their capacity to detect such attempts, primarily by Russia, to target member states with informational campaigns designed to interfere in elections and support politicians and parties that express skepticism toward NATO and exhibit greater affinity for Vladimir Putin.
This is particularly relevant in the context of recent developments in Romania—where a major court has recently annulled the outcome of the initial voting round in a presidential election due to concerns regarding an overseas interference operation—this will undoubtedly raise warning signs across NATO capitals.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
‘I don’t believe in COVID – nobody’s seen it’
The initial round was claimed by Calin Georgescu, a relatively obscure far-right contender who faces allegations from detractors of being anti-NATO and of holding a favorable view of Russia’s leader.
However, Georgescu informed Sky News he “is a patriot and a leader, but I am not an admirer of Mr. Putin.”
His unexpected electoral success was driven by a blend of populist, anti-establishment messaging and an extraordinarily effective social media campaign, particularly on TikTok.
👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈
However, Romanian authorities subsequently asserted that Russia initiated a “hybrid assault” on the nation to enhance Georgescu’s prospects, magnifying his campaign messages throughout social media.
Read more from Sky News:
Man leaps on polar bear to defend wife
South Korea: Calls for president’s suspension
Syrian rebels close in on central city of Homs
Intelligence reports have even been declassified, suggesting that he benefited from a widespread influence campaign—executed from outside the country—to manipulate the election results.
When confronted with this by Sky News’s Adam Parsons, Georgescu accused the government of resorting to desperation. However, the Romanian constitutional court’s choice to intervene and annul the outcomes adds a serious aspect—and risk—to the ongoing situation.
If Russian interference is established, it would imply that the Kremlin has attempted a significant attack on NATO below the threshold of conventional warfare—a move that would indeed necessitate some form of an unconventional response from the allies.
Simultaneously, the annulment of votes will inevitably spark accusations that Romania’s own leadership is undermining the democratic processes within the nation.
